Examiner Tuan Le

Grant ratio: 72.0% (54th percentile in Art Unit 2662 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.00
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82205
Primary art unit
2662
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
422
Granted applications
304
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1130
Supervisor
Lin Ye
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7372

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 61.4% 1.59
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.08 878 office actions across 423 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 423 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 198 46.8%
2 OAs 114 27.0%
3 OAs 47 11.1%
4 OAs 35 8.3%
5+ OAs 29 6.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 61.1% 2008 2009: 45.5% 2009 2010: 60.0% 2010 2011: 82.4% 2011 2012: 53.3% 2012 2013: 75.0% 2013 2014: 58.3% 2014 2015: 72.7% 2015 2016: 69.6% 2016 2017: 65.2% 2017 2018: 90.0% 2018 2019: 86.4% 2019 2020: 79.3% 2020 2021: 96.2% 2021 2022: 82.8% 2022 2023: 86.7% 2023 2024: 85.7% 2024 2025: 66.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008181161.1%
2009221045.5%
2010352160.0%
2011342882.4%
201215853.3%
2013282175.0%
2014241458.3%
2015221672.7%
2016231669.6%
2017231565.2%
2018201890.0%
2019221986.4%
2020292379.3%
2021262596.2%
2022292482.8%
2023151386.7%
2024141285.7%
2025151066.7%
2026800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 423 2.4% 10.4% 78.0% 1.9%
Action 2 225 0.0% 6.7% 89.3% 1.3%
Action 3 111 0.9% 3.6% 94.6% 0.9%
Action 4 64 0.0% 3.1% 90.6% 4.7%
Action 5 29 0.0% 6.9% 93.1% 0.0%
Action 6 17 0.0% 5.9% 88.2% 5.9%
Action 7 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.0% 1 of 49 office actions
All years 1.3% 11 of 878 office actions
Change +0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.6%
0.0%
6.1%
1.6%
0.0%
2019: PEG
7.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
5.6%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 6, 2018 14/848,490 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 24, 2016 12/940,756 Reversed §103
Jan. 20, 2016 11/791,629 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 8, 2014 10/769,652 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.