Examiner Siamak Harandi

Grant ratio: 84.5% (98th percentile in Art Unit 2662 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.25. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 84.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.25
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87849
Primary art unit
2662
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
756
Granted applications
639
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1832
Supervisor
Stephen Koziol
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1844

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 34 61.4% 1.59
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.25 946 office actions across 756 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 755 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 601 79.5%
2 OAs 127 16.8%
3 OAs 20 2.6%
4 OAs 5 0.7%
5+ OAs 2 0.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 66.7% 2011 2012: 83.3% 2012 2013: 91.1% 2013 2014: 89.2% 2014 2015: 96.7% 2015 2016: 93.3% 2016 2017: 91.7% 2017 2018: 97.4% 2018 2019: 97.0% 2019 2020: 86.0% 2020 2021: 92.8% 2021 2022: 97.9% 2022 2023: 92.2% 2023 2024: 88.2% 2024 2025: 51.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011271866.7%
2012423583.3%
2013454191.1%
2014655889.2%
2015615996.7%
2016454293.3%
2017484491.7%
2018393897.4%
2019333297.0%
2020433786.0%
2021837792.8%
2022474697.9%
2023645992.2%
2024343088.2%
2025452351.1%
20263500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 755 13.1% 7.4% 53.6% 13.1%
Action 2 154 9.7% 10.4% 58.4% 16.2%
Action 3 27 7.4% 0.0% 74.1% 18.5%
Action 4 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 5 2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 19.5% 29 of 149 office actions
All years 12.4% 117 of 946 office actions
Change +7.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

16.7%
4.0%
10.3%
2014: Alice
12.1%
10.3%
14.3%
21.7%
28.3%
2019: PEG
7.9%
3.1%
3.1%
5.2%
20.0%
2024: AI examples
17.1%
2025: August memo
24.1%
8.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 25, 2023 16/699,659 Affirmed §103 · §112 · §120
Jan. 17, 2017 12/996,424 Affirmed §103
Aug. 8, 2016 13/433,948 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.