Examiner Dwight Alex C. Tejano

Grant ratio: 77.3% (78th percentile in Art Unit 2663 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2022
Grant ratio 77.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.03
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86119
Primary art unit
2663
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
543
Granted applications
420

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 59.0% 1.85
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.14 1,173 office actions across 547 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 547 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 255 46.6%
2 OAs 130 23.8%
3 OAs 61 11.2%
4 OAs 60 11.0%
5+ OAs 41 7.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 34.5% 2009 2010: 66.7% 2010 2011: 63.6% 2011 2012: 87.9% 2012 2013: 81.8% 2013 2014: 76.2% 2014 2015: 81.0% 2015 2016: 77.1% 2016 2017: 88.6% 2017 2018: 68.6% 2018 2019: 84.3% 2019 2020: 75.0% 2020 2021: 93.5% 2021 2022: 94.6% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008300.0%
2009291034.5%
2010271866.7%
2011442863.6%
2012332987.9%
2013443681.8%
2014423276.2%
2015423481.0%
2016352777.1%
2017353188.6%
2018352468.6%
2019514384.3%
2020403075.0%
2021464393.5%
2022373594.6%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 547 1.3% 30.3% 65.8% 0.9%
Action 2 292 1.7% 17.1% 78.8% 0.3%
Action 3 162 0.0% 10.5% 88.9% 0.6%
Action 4 101 1.0% 14.9% 83.2% 0.0%
Action 5 41 0.0% 7.3% 92.7% 0.0%
Action 6 21 0.0% 9.5% 90.5% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 16.7% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.1% 13 of 1,173 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
1.2%
0.0%
1.1%
2014: Alice
1.1%
0.0%
2.7%
3.2%
1.2%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.3%
2.6%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 20, 2022 16/726,236 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 7, 2018 14/256,585 Affirmed §102
May. 1, 2013 11/732,427 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.