Examiner Marly Camargo

Grant ratio: 81.1% (70th percentile in Art Unit 2664 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.38. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 81.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.38
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84776
Primary art unit
2664
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
698
Granted applications
566
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3729

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 67.8% 1.65
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.39 971 office actions across 698 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 697 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 497 71.2%
2 OAs 151 21.6%
3 OAs 34 4.9%
4 OAs 9 1.3%
5+ OAs 6 0.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 56.0% 2008 2009: 80.4% 2009 2010: 71.1% 2010 2011: 84.4% 2011 2012: 83.8% 2012 2013: 79.4% 2013 2014: 84.2% 2014 2015: 89.3% 2015 2016: 93.0% 2016 2017: 92.3% 2017 2018: 86.4% 2018 2019: 91.7% 2019 2020: 84.6% 2020 2021: 97.8% 2021 2022: 96.6% 2022 2023: 97.2% 2023 2024: 93.3% 2024 2025: 40.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008251456.0%
2009514180.4%
2010382771.1%
2011322784.4%
2012373183.8%
2013342779.4%
2014191684.2%
2015282589.3%
2016434093.0%
2017393692.3%
2018443886.4%
2019484491.7%
2020393384.6%
2021454497.8%
2022292896.6%
2023363597.2%
2024454293.3%
2025441840.9%
20262200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 697 2.0% 20.7% 59.7% 5.7%
Action 2 200 0.5% 15.0% 74.5% 6.5%
Action 3 49 2.0% 14.3% 75.5% 6.1%
Action 4 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.4% 3 of 125 office actions
All years 1.6% 16 of 971 office actions
Change +0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.1%
2.3%
1.7%
2.3%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.4%
1.6%
2.9%
1.7%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
4.4%
2025: August memo
0.0%
4.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 4, 2021 15/480,521 Affirmed §103
Jan. 19, 2021 14/539,409 Reversed §103
Mar. 16, 2018 14/052,528 Affirmed §103
Jul. 25, 2014 11/190,516 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Sep. 26, 2013 12/684,505 Reversed N/A
Mar. 28, 2013 11/260,437 Affirmed §103
Feb. 28, 2013 11/260,354 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 15, 2011 11/190,516 Remanded §120

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.