Examiner Xin Jia

Grant ratio: 76.9% (52nd percentile in Art Unit 2667 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.89. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.89
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89841
Primary art unit
2667
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
642
Granted applications
494
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5536
Supervisor
Gregory Morse
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3838

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 60.8% 1.65
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.92 1,233 office actions across 642 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 641 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 336 52.3%
2 OAs 169 26.3%
3 OAs 49 7.6%
4 OAs 49 7.6%
5+ OAs 38 5.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 78.1% 2013 2014: 67.7% 2014 2015: 60.5% 2015 2016: 84.4% 2016 2017: 73.6% 2017 2018: 85.4% 2018 2019: 86.8% 2019 2020: 87.7% 2020 2021: 89.2% 2021 2022: 89.2% 2022 2023: 93.1% 2023 2024: 95.7% 2024 2025: 56.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012100.0%
2013322578.1%
2014312167.7%
2015382360.5%
2016453884.4%
2017533973.6%
2018413585.4%
2019534686.8%
2020575087.7%
2021655889.2%
2022373389.2%
2023585493.1%
2024474595.7%
2025482756.3%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 641 1.7% 3.7% 85.5% 0.9%
Action 2 305 0.0% 2.0% 94.4% 0.3%
Action 3 136 0.0% 0.7% 98.5% 0.0%
Action 4 87 0.0% 1.1% 97.7% 0.0%
Action 5 38 0.0% 0.0% 97.4% 0.0%
Action 6 19 0.0% 0.0% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 198 office actions
All years 0.9% 11 of 1,233 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.2%
3.1%
5.8%
1.3%
2024: AI examples
1.5%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 22, 2022 15/863,361 Reversed §103
Dec. 9, 2021 15/865,581 Affirmed §103
Jan. 4, 2021 16/025,621 Reversed §101 · §103
Jan. 1, 2021 15/655,662 Affirmed in part §101 · §103
Apr. 9, 2020 15/345,678 Reversed §103
Apr. 17, 2018 14/548,691 Reversed §103
Aug. 25, 2017 13/190,228 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 17, 2017 13/133,584 Affirmed §103
Nov. 23, 2016 13/077,074 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.