Examiner Nancy Bitar

Grant ratio: 77.9% (56th percentile in Art Unit 2669 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.94. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.94
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82162
Primary art unit
2669
Work group
2660
Technology center
2600
Applications
977
Granted applications
761
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1041
Supervisor
Mr. Nay Maung
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2976

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 29 60.7% 1.60
Group 289 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.96 1,919 office actions across 977 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 971 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.6%
1 OA 478 48.9%
2 OAs 257 26.3%
3 OAs 119 12.2%
4 OAs 61 6.2%
5+ OAs 56 5.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 62.7% 2008 2009: 62.3% 2009 2010: 73.7% 2010 2011: 87.8% 2011 2012: 81.8% 2012 2013: 80.6% 2013 2014: 85.7% 2014 2015: 82.9% 2015 2016: 86.0% 2016 2017: 94.5% 2017 2018: 90.0% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2020: 89.8% 2020 2021: 97.7% 2021 2022: 88.5% 2022 2023: 82.4% 2023 2024: 84.8% 2024 2025: 27.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008513262.7%
2009533362.3%
2010382873.7%
2011413687.8%
2012554581.8%
2013625080.6%
2014706085.7%
2015705882.9%
2016574986.0%
2017555294.5%
2018605490.0%
2019605083.3%
2020494489.8%
2021434297.7%
2022524688.5%
2023514282.4%
2024332884.8%
2025441227.3%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 971 3.5% 8.5% 81.9% 2.1%
Action 2 493 1.4% 2.8% 94.1% 0.4%
Action 3 236 1.3% 0.8% 97.0% 0.0%
Action 4 117 0.9% 0.0% 97.4% 0.0%
Action 5 56 0.0% 0.0% 94.6% 0.0%
Action 6 26 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 200 office actions
All years 2.3% 45 of 1,919 office actions
Change -2.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.3%
5.5%
1.3%
1.2%
3.8%
2.5%
2014: Alice
6.8%
4.3%
0.9%
5.2%
1.7%
2019: PEG
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 8, 2024 17/602,820 Reversed §103
Nov. 4, 2016 12/256,962 Affirmed §101 · §103
May. 12, 2016 13/107,427 Affirmed §103
Jun. 26, 2012 10/526,513 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.