Examiner Pawandeep Dhingra

Grant ratio: 54.1% (38th percentile in Art Unit 2672 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.60. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 54.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.60
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82476
Primary art unit
2672
Work group
2670
Technology center
2600
Applications
518
Granted applications
280
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1231
Supervisor
Abderrahim Merouan
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5254

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 53.4% 1.76
Group 138 53.2% 1.79
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.73 1,413 office actions across 518 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 515 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.6%
1 OA 139 26.8%
2 OAs 143 27.6%
3 OAs 81 15.6%
4 OAs 83 16.0%
5+ OAs 69 13.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 37.5% 2008 2009: 28.6% 2009 2010: 47.4% 2010 2011: 44.0% 2011 2012: 40.0% 2012 2013: 38.5% 2013 2014: 45.5% 2014 2015: 58.3% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 55.6% 2017 2018: 53.3% 2018 2019: 72.5% 2019 2020: 52.0% 2020 2021: 79.2% 2021 2022: 56.1% 2022 2023: 81.8% 2023 2024: 86.8% 2024 2025: 62.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200816637.5%
200921628.6%
201019947.4%
2011251144.0%
201220840.0%
2013261038.5%
2014221045.5%
2015241458.3%
2016221150.0%
2017271555.6%
2018301653.3%
2019402972.5%
2020251352.0%
2021241979.2%
2022412356.1%
2023332781.8%
2024383386.8%
2025322062.5%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 515 0.2% 6.6% 90.7% 1.2%
Action 2 376 0.5% 2.4% 94.9% 0.5%
Action 3 233 0.4% 0.0% 97.4% 2.1%
Action 4 152 0.0% 0.0% 99.3% 0.7%
Action 5 69 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 34 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 17 0.0% 5.9% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 8 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 9 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.0% 4 of 204 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,413 office actions
Change +1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
3.9%
2025: August memo
1.8%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 29, 2026 18/586,728 Reversed §103
Dec. 24, 2020 15/270,417 Affirmed §103
Oct. 9, 2018 14/248,561 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 11, 2015 11/490,517 Reversed N/A
Aug. 29, 2014 10/384,657 Reversed N/A
Jun. 12, 2012 10/670,902 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.