Examiner Chad Dickerson

Grant ratio: 54.7% (43rd percentile in Art Unit 2672 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.37. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 54.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.37
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82662
Primary art unit
2672
Work group
2670
Technology center
2600
Applications
649
Granted applications
355
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1351
Supervisor
Benny Tieu
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7490

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 53.4% 1.76
Group 138 53.2% 1.79
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.49 1,618 office actions across 649 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 648 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 210 32.4%
2 OAs 197 30.4%
3 OAs 98 15.1%
4 OAs 78 12.0%
5+ OAs 65 10.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 19.2% 2008 2009: 31.0% 2009 2010: 48.4% 2010 2011: 44.0% 2011 2012: 45.9% 2012 2013: 52.8% 2013 2014: 72.5% 2014 2015: 76.0% 2015 2016: 51.6% 2016 2017: 61.8% 2017 2018: 79.4% 2018 2019: 66.7% 2019 2020: 63.9% 2020 2021: 82.2% 2021 2022: 68.6% 2022 2023: 75.0% 2023 2024: 82.4% 2024 2025: 20.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200826519.2%
200929931.0%
2010311548.4%
2011251144.0%
2012371745.9%
2013361952.8%
2014402972.5%
2015251976.0%
2016311651.6%
2017342161.8%
2018342779.4%
2019302066.7%
2020362363.9%
2021453782.2%
2022352468.6%
2023362775.0%
2024342882.4%
202540820.0%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 648 0.5% 5.6% 91.0% 2.0%
Action 2 438 0.5% 2.1% 94.7% 1.6%
Action 3 241 0.4% 1.7% 95.9% 1.2%
Action 4 143 0.0% 1.4% 97.9% 0.7%
Action 5 65 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 38 0.0% 5.3% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 7 22 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 9.1%
Action 8 14 0.0% 7.1% 78.6% 14.3%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.1% 5 of 242 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,618 office actions
Change +1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
5.6%
2025: August memo
1.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
32.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 20, 2018 11/412,258 Reversed §103
Nov. 8, 2016 13/082,902 Affirmed §103
Nov. 5, 2015 11/223,106 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 28, 2015 11/021,105 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 31, 2013 11/229,343 Affirmed §101 · §103
Sep. 9, 2013 10/661,263 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
May. 24, 2013 10/801,189 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 14, 2012 10/633,076 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.