Examiner Scott A Rogers

Grant ratio: 85.4% (90th percentile in Art Unit 2673 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.36. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 85.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.36
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
66841
Primary art unit
2673
Work group
2670
Technology center
2600
Applications
657
Granted applications
561
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7467
Supervisor
Mark Zimmerman
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7653

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 16 50.9% 1.70
Group 138 53.2% 1.79
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.39 914 office actions across 657 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 654 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.5%
1 OA 476 72.5%
2 OAs 128 19.5%
3 OAs 27 4.1%
4 OAs 18 2.7%
5+ OAs 5 0.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 87.5% 2008 2009: 94.1% 2009 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 97.7% 2011 2012: 94.1% 2012 2013: 84.8% 2013 2014: 94.1% 2014 2015: 91.4% 2015 2016: 95.0% 2016 2017: 94.6% 2017 2018: 88.2% 2018 2019: 90.0% 2019 2020: 77.8% 2020 2021: 90.9% 2021 2022: 90.9% 2022 2023: 82.8% 2023 2024: 93.8% 2024 2025: 68.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008403587.5%
2009514894.1%
20103535100.0%
2011444397.7%
2012343294.1%
2013332884.8%
2014343294.1%
2015353291.4%
2016403895.0%
2017373594.6%
2018343088.2%
2019302790.0%
2020272177.8%
2021222090.9%
2022222090.9%
2023292482.8%
2024323093.8%
2025453168.9%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 654 15.7% 10.1% 39.3% 14.2%
Action 2 178 4.5% 11.8% 58.4% 12.9%
Action 3 50 2.0% 8.0% 60.0% 14.0%
Action 4 23 4.3% 0.0% 69.6% 13.0%
Action 5 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 6 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.1% 5 of 159 office actions
All years 12.4% 113 of 914 office actions
Change -9.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

5.2%
17.4%
5.8%
23.8%
26.4%
17.3%
2014: Alice
6.5%
15.8%
14.5%
22.6%
15.2%
2019: PEG
7.9%
14.6%
3.7%
12.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.3%
2025: August memo
3.3%
5.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 12, 2020 15/255,476 Affirmed §103
Nov. 26, 2014 12/239,997 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.