Examiner Andrew H. Lam

Grant ratio: 78.8% (87th percentile in Art Unit 2675 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.53. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.53
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80950
Primary art unit
2675
Work group
2670
Technology center
2600
Applications
565
Granted applications
445
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7969
Supervisor
Firmin Backer
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-6703

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 56.8% 1.82
Group 138 53.2% 1.79
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.61 911 office actions across 565 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 565 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 369 65.3%
2 OAs 119 21.1%
3 OAs 34 6.0%
4 OAs 23 4.1%
5+ OAs 20 3.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 66.7% 2012 2013: 62.5% 2013 2014: 59.3% 2014 2015: 70.2% 2015 2016: 87.2% 2016 2017: 90.2% 2017 2018: 98.2% 2018 2019: 95.9% 2019 2020: 72.1% 2020 2021: 89.7% 2021 2022: 90.9% 2022 2023: 94.6% 2023 2024: 94.1% 2024 2025: 57.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201212866.7%
2013322062.5%
2014271659.3%
2015473370.2%
2016474187.2%
2017514690.2%
2018555498.2%
2019494795.9%
2020433172.1%
2021393589.7%
2022222090.9%
2023373594.6%
2024343294.1%
2025472757.4%
20262300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 565 5.5% 17.3% 72.7% 2.5%
Action 2 196 0.0% 13.8% 84.7% 0.5%
Action 3 77 0.0% 14.3% 81.8% 2.6%
Action 4 43 0.0% 7.0% 88.4% 2.3%
Action 5 20 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 0.0%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 23.8% 30 of 126 office actions
All years 3.4% 31 of 911 office actions
Change +20.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
2024: AI examples
10.8%
2025: August memo
53.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 12, 2019 14/460,332 Affirmed in part §103
Oct. 30, 2018 13/018,620 Affirmed §103
Sep. 27, 2017 14/682,881 Reversed §103
Dec. 28, 2016 13/632,686 Affirmed §103
Dec. 14, 2016 13/900,828 Affirmed in part §103
May. 31, 2016 12/836,642 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.