Examiner Examiner Richard Z. Zhu

Grant ratio: 63.9% (34th percentile in Art Unit 2675 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.44. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 63.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.44
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83126
Primary art unit
2675
Work group
2670
Technology center
2600
Applications
760
Granted applications
486
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1587
Supervisor
Marivelisse Santiago-Cordero
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7839

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 56.8% 1.82
Group 138 53.2% 1.79
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.59 1,971 office actions across 760 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 758 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 226 29.7%
2 OAs 232 30.5%
3 OAs 125 16.4%
4 OAs 84 11.1%
5+ OAs 91 12.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 32.4% 2008 2009: 39.5% 2009 2010: 52.8% 2010 2011: 65.8% 2011 2012: 56.5% 2012 2013: 71.4% 2013 2014: 65.8% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 78.9% 2016 2017: 67.6% 2017 2018: 66.7% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2020: 78.9% 2020 2021: 84.2% 2021 2022: 86.4% 2022 2023: 78.3% 2023 2024: 86.4% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008341132.4%
2009431739.5%
2010361952.8%
2011382565.8%
2012462656.5%
2013423071.4%
2014382565.8%
2015422866.7%
2016383078.9%
2017372567.6%
2018392666.7%
2019363083.3%
2020383078.9%
2021383284.2%
2022443886.4%
2023463678.3%
2024443886.4%
2025402050.0%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 758 2.5% 9.4% 83.9% 1.5%
Action 2 532 2.3% 5.5% 89.7% 0.9%
Action 3 300 2.0% 3.3% 92.7% 1.3%
Action 4 175 1.7% 0.6% 96.6% 0.6%
Action 5 91 0.0% 2.2% 95.6% 1.1%
Action 6 59 0.0% 0.0% 98.3% 1.7%
Action 7 27 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.0% 8 of 271 office actions
All years 2.0% 40 of 1,971 office actions
Change +0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.6%
4.0%
0.8%
0.9%
0.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
1.9%
5.1%
2019: PEG
3.3%
2.2%
1.0%
1.1%
2.3%
2024: AI examples
4.5%
2025: August memo
2.2%
3.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 28. Merits outcomes: 18 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 9 reversed.

Full reversal rate
32.1% 9/28 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
35.7% 10/28 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.5 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 1, 2024 16/722,569 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 29, 2024 16/520,374 Affirmed §103
Mar. 31, 2023 16/671,830 Reversed N/A
Feb. 28, 2023 16/431,185 Reversed §103
Mar. 28, 2022 15/641,632 Affirmed New ground of rejection §101
Jan. 20, 2022 15/690,810 Affirmed §101 · §103
Sep. 4, 2020 14/036,728 Affirmed §103
May. 29, 2020 14/436,045 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Sep. 30, 2019 13/793,856 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 25, 2017 13/722,854 Affirmed §102 · §103
Mar. 30, 2017 12/338,829 Affirmed §103
Jan. 30, 2017 13/308,061 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.