Examiner Dov Popovici

Grant ratio: 83.9% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 2677 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.52. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 83.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.52
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
72475
Primary art unit
2677
Work group
2670
Technology center
2600
Applications
565
Granted applications
474
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4083
Supervisor
Akwasi M. Sarpong
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3438

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 58.0% 1.74
Group 138 53.2% 1.79
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.52 857 office actions across 565 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 565 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 390 69.0%
2 OAs 111 19.6%
3 OAs 29 5.1%
4 OAs 23 4.1%
5+ OAs 12 2.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 50.0% 2007 2008: 85.4% 2008 2009: 86.4% 2009 2010: 80.0% 2010 2011: 100.0% 2011 2012: 90.0% 2012 2013: 89.3% 2013 2014: 85.3% 2014 2015: 97.2% 2015 2016: 89.3% 2016 2017: 87.5% 2017 2018: 69.2% 2018 2019: 83.3% 2019 2020: 90.0% 2020 2021: 85.0% 2021 2022: 72.2% 2022 2023: 95.5% 2023 2024: 84.2% 2024 2025: 44.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20072150.0%
2008413585.4%
2009665786.4%
2010403280.0%
20114040100.0%
2012302790.0%
2013282589.3%
2014342985.3%
2015363597.2%
2016282589.3%
2017322887.5%
2018261869.2%
2019242083.3%
2020302790.0%
2021201785.0%
2022181372.2%
2023222195.5%
2024191684.2%
202518844.4%
20261100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 565 6.5% 29.4% 40.2% 20.4%
Action 2 175 4.6% 26.3% 44.6% 24.0%
Action 3 64 4.7% 23.4% 53.1% 17.2%
Action 4 35 8.6% 17.1% 54.3% 20.0%
Action 5 12 8.3% 25.0% 50.0% 16.7%
Action 6 5 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 20.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 10.5% 6 of 57 office actions
All years 6.2% 53 of 857 office actions
Change +4.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.7%
3.3%
7.1%
9.8%
7.7%
4.3%
2014: Alice
3.1%
3.8%
6.5%
11.4%
12.8%
2019: PEG
2.5%
2.5%
3.3%
13.6%
8.7%
2024: AI examples
9.5%
2025: August memo
11.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 5, 2020 15/356,738 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Jun. 26, 2019 14/844,584 Reversed §101 · §102 · §112
Jan. 30, 2018 13/849,752 Reversed §102
Oct. 15, 2013 11/329,999 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.