Examiner Laura Nguyen

Grant ratio: 58.0% (43rd percentile in Art Unit 2683 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2019
Grant ratio 58.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.33
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88413
Primary art unit
2683
Work group
2680
Technology center
2600
Applications
281
Granted applications
163

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 57.9% 1.97
Group 114 64.6% 1.80
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.41 694 office actions across 288 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 288 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 97 33.7%
2 OAs 86 29.9%
3 OAs 45 15.6%
4 OAs 38 13.2%
5+ OAs 22 7.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 53.8% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 54.8% 2014 2015: 35.0% 2015 2016: 52.2% 2016 2017: 55.8% 2017 2018: 68.6% 2018 2019: 77.8% 2019

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201213753.8%
2013301550.0%
2014422354.8%
201520735.0%
2016462452.2%
2017432455.8%
2018513568.6%
2019362877.8%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 288 0.7% 0.7% 89.9% 7.3%
Action 2 191 0.0% 1.6% 91.6% 5.8%
Action 3 105 1.0% 0.0% 92.4% 6.7%
Action 4 60 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 6.7%
Action 5 22 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
Action 6 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.4% 3 of 694 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
1.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 22, 2020 15/184,312 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 29, 2019 13/705,130 Affirmed §103
May. 30, 2018 14/072,086 Affirmed §103
May. 5, 2017 13/403,713 Reversed §103
Jul. 8, 2016 13/232,248 Affirmed §103
Mar. 8, 2016 12/886,798 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 4, 2015 12/633,997 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 14, 2015 12/793,856 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.