Examiner Shirley Lu

Grant ratio: 75.8% (55th percentile in Art Unit 2686 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.62. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2021
Grant ratio 75.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.62
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80872
Primary art unit
2686
Work group
2680
Technology center
2600
Applications
592
Granted applications
449

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 12 68.6% 1.64
Group 114 64.6% 1.80
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.66 984 office actions across 592 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 592 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 384 64.9%
2 OAs 119 20.1%
3 OAs 46 7.8%
4 OAs 23 3.9%
5+ OAs 20 3.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 65.5% 2008 2009: 40.6% 2009 2010: 28.9% 2010 2011: 71.4% 2011 2012: 72.0% 2012 2013: 73.7% 2013 2014: 66.0% 2014 2015: 78.3% 2015 2016: 92.2% 2016 2017: 81.4% 2017 2018: 98.1% 2018 2019: 95.7% 2019 2020: 85.1% 2020 2021: 87.5% 2021

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008291965.5%
2009321340.6%
2010381128.9%
2011493571.4%
2012251872.0%
2013382873.7%
2014473166.0%
2015604778.3%
2016514792.2%
2017594881.4%
2018545398.1%
2019474595.7%
2020474085.1%
2021161487.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 592 2.7% 3.5% 81.8% 2.9%
Action 2 208 1.0% 4.8% 88.5% 1.4%
Action 3 89 0.0% 4.5% 93.3% 1.1%
Action 4 43 0.0% 2.3% 97.7% 0.0%
Action 5 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.8% 18 of 984 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.4%
2.8%
3.2%
4.2%
8.5%
2019: PEG
6.5%
1.3%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 23. Merits outcomes: 11 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
34.8% 8/23 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
52.2% 12/23 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 25, 2017 13/841,235 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Sep. 30, 2016 13/158,866 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 24, 2016 12/741,229 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Apr. 26, 2016 13/155,923 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 27, 2016 12/308,334 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 17, 2015 12/554,114 Reversed §103
Apr. 22, 2015 11/629,252 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 23, 2015 11/960,504 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 17, 2015 12/773,161 Reversed N/A
Mar. 13, 2015 12/173,630 Reversed N/A
Mar. 4, 2015 11/699,172 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 19, 2014 11/717,360 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.