Examiner Hongmin Fan

Grant ratio: 74.9% (45th percentile in Art Unit 2686 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.76. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2025
Grant ratio 74.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.76
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81424
Primary art unit
2686
Work group
2680
Technology center
2600
Applications
953
Granted applications
714

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 12 68.6% 1.64
Group 114 64.6% 1.80
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.81 1,733 office actions across 956 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 956 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 555 58.1%
2 OAs 228 23.8%
3 OAs 82 8.6%
4 OAs 43 4.5%
5+ OAs 48 5.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 48.8% 2008 2009: 49.0% 2009 2010: 55.9% 2010 2011: 61.5% 2011 2012: 47.5% 2012 2013: 58.5% 2013 2014: 60.0% 2014 2015: 63.9% 2015 2016: 71.0% 2016 2017: 85.7% 2017 2018: 87.9% 2018 2019: 85.9% 2019 2020: 89.1% 2020 2021: 86.3% 2021 2022: 86.5% 2022 2023: 92.0% 2023 2024: 85.7% 2024 2025: 75.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008412048.8%
2009492449.0%
2010341955.9%
2011523261.5%
2012401947.5%
2013412458.5%
2014452760.0%
2015362363.9%
2016694971.0%
2017564885.7%
2018665887.9%
2019716185.9%
2020645789.1%
2021736386.3%
2022746486.5%
2023756992.0%
2024635485.7%
20254375.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 956 1.5% 4.8% 74.0% 3.6%
Action 2 401 0.2% 2.7% 89.8% 0.5%
Action 3 173 0.0% 2.9% 93.1% 2.9%
Action 4 91 0.0% 2.2% 96.7% 0.0%
Action 5 48 0.0% 4.2% 89.6% 2.1%
Action 6 28 0.0% 7.1% 89.3% 3.6%
Action 7 17 0.0% 11.8% 76.5% 5.9%
Action 8 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 1 of 110 office actions
All years 0.9% 15 of 1,733 office actions
Change +0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
3.6%
1.0%
0.8%
3.8%
2.2%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 13, 2019 14/565,096 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 19, 2017 13/985,107 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 23, 2016 13/467,919 Affirmed §103
Dec. 13, 2016 12/332,990 Reversed §103 · §112
Nov. 29, 2016 12/765,526 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 28, 2016 12/479,452 Affirmed §103
May. 12, 2014 12/011,722 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 22, 2012 10/564,371 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.