Examiner Jack K. Wang

Grant ratio: 58.2% (19th percentile in Art Unit 2687 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 58.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.03
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84630
Primary art unit
2687
Work group
2680
Technology center
2600
Applications
760
Granted applications
442
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1938
Supervisor
Curtis Kuntz
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7499

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 13 70.2% 1.72
Group 114 64.6% 1.80
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.00 1,523 office actions across 760 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 758 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 385 50.7%
2 OAs 183 24.1%
3 OAs 88 11.6%
4 OAs 53 7.0%
5+ OAs 49 6.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 28.3% 2008 2009: 31.6% 2009 2010: 45.7% 2010 2011: 62.3% 2011 2012: 48.3% 2012 2013: 55.3% 2013 2014: 65.1% 2014 2015: 64.6% 2015 2016: 66.1% 2016 2017: 75.9% 2017 2018: 82.5% 2018 2019: 75.7% 2019 2020: 40.9% 2020 2021: 64.0% 2021 2022: 75.9% 2022 2023: 87.0% 2023 2024: 75.0% 2024 2025: 42.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007200.0%
2008461328.3%
2009381231.6%
2010462145.7%
2011533362.3%
2012582848.3%
2013472655.3%
2014432865.1%
2015483164.6%
2016563766.1%
2017584475.9%
2018574782.5%
2019372875.7%
202022940.9%
2021251664.0%
2022292275.9%
2023232087.0%
2024241875.0%
202521942.9%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 758 0.7% 9.5% 79.6% 0.5%
Action 2 373 1.3% 9.9% 78.8% 5.6%
Action 3 190 0.0% 8.4% 86.8% 1.6%
Action 4 102 1.0% 11.8% 78.4% 5.9%
Action 5 49 0.0% 12.2% 75.5% 8.2%
Action 6 23 4.3% 8.7% 87.0% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 9.1% 63.6% 18.2%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.7% 2 of 121 office actions
All years 0.8% 12 of 1,523 office actions
Change +0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
0.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.9%
1.2%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
2.9%
3.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 27. Merits outcomes: 10 affirmed, 6 affirmed in part, and 11 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.7% 11/27 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
63.0% 17/27 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.1 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 7, 2024 16/176,859 Reversed §103
Mar. 22, 2021 13/395,059 Reversed §103
Dec. 16, 2020 12/405,997 Reversed §103
Jun. 27, 2019 15/275,506 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Feb. 26, 2019 14/869,829 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 17, 2018 14/439,445 Reversed §102 · §103
Nov. 15, 2018 14/533,443 Reversed N/A
Jun. 25, 2018 13/355,567 Affirmed §103
Mar. 13, 2018 14/384,527 Affirmed §102 · §120
Jan. 3, 2017 13/417,267 Affirmed in part §103
Jul. 21, 2016 11/922,425 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103
May. 17, 2016 12/536,202 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.