Examiner Kam Wan Ma

Grant ratio: 53.9% (13th percentile in Art Unit 2688 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.90. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 53.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.90
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87242
Primary art unit
2688
Work group
2680
Technology center
2600
Applications
410
Granted applications
221
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3693
Supervisor
Steven Lim
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1210

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 66.1% 1.68
Group 114 64.6% 1.80
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.97 807 office actions across 410 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 409 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 191 46.6%
2 OAs 125 30.5%
3 OAs 45 11.0%
4 OAs 28 6.8%
5+ OAs 20 4.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 42.9% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 30.8% 2014 2015: 13.3% 2015 2016: 47.1% 2016 2017: 44.4% 2017 2018: 72.2% 2018 2019: 66.7% 2019 2020: 58.3% 2020 2021: 61.9% 2021 2022: 61.1% 2022 2023: 84.2% 2023 2024: 80.0% 2024 2025: 62.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010100.0%
2011281242.9%
2012221150.0%
2013241250.0%
201413430.8%
201515213.3%
201617847.1%
20179444.4%
2018181372.2%
2019181266.7%
2020241458.3%
2021211361.9%
2022362261.1%
2023383284.2%
2024504080.0%
2025352262.9%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 409 0.5% 6.8% 80.7% 8.6%
Action 2 218 0.9% 5.0% 87.6% 4.1%
Action 3 93 0.0% 0.0% 94.6% 4.3%
Action 4 48 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 6.3%
Action 5 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 257 office actions
All years 0.5% 4 of 807 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
11.1% 1/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
11.1% 1/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 10, 2023 15/263,401 Reversed §103
Apr. 6, 2023 14/585,255 Affirmed §103
May. 26, 2022 16/754,427 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 29, 2019 13/414,814 Affirmed §103
May. 25, 2017 12/816,795 Affirmed §103
May. 17, 2016 11/886,530 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jun. 25, 2015 12/302,987 Affirmed N/A
May. 22, 2015 12/226,834 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 13, 2015 12/056,778 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.