Examiner Kelly B. Hegarty

Grant ratio: 64.5% (36th percentile in Art Unit 2692 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2018
Grant ratio 64.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.33
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86631
Primary art unit
2692
Work group
2690
Technology center
2600
Applications
231
Granted applications
149

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 56.1% 2.01
Group 96 51.2% 2.11
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.28 566 office actions across 248 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 248 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 90 36.3%
2 OAs 80 32.3%
3 OAs 30 12.1%
4 OAs 30 12.1%
5+ OAs 18 7.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 42.9% 2009 2010: 64.3% 2010 2011: 66.7% 2011 2012: 73.7% 2012 2013: 48.3% 2013 2014: 56.3% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 67.7% 2016 2017: 66.7% 2017 2018: 76.9% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20097342.9%
2010281864.3%
2011271866.7%
2012382873.7%
2013291448.3%
201416956.3%
2015241666.7%
2016312167.7%
2017181266.7%
2018131076.9%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 248 0.0% 7.7% 90.3% 0.0%
Action 2 158 0.0% 8.9% 90.5% 0.6%
Action 3 78 0.0% 3.8% 96.2% 0.0%
Action 4 48 0.0% 2.1% 95.8% 2.1%
Action 5 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 566 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 2, 2020 13/858,183 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 20, 2016 12/504,015 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 14, 2015 12/108,733 Reversed N/A
Jun. 26, 2015 11/866,708 Reversed N/A
Apr. 30, 2014 11/570,541 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 25, 2013 11/585,376 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.