Examiner Richard J Hong

Grant ratio: 69.7% (53rd percentile in Art Unit 2692 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.83. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 69.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.83
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90501
Primary art unit
2692
Work group
2620
Technology center
2600
Applications
646
Granted applications
450
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7765

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 56.1% 2.01
Group 279 55.5% 2.00
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.98 1,282 office actions across 646 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 643 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.5%
1 OA 344 53.3%
2 OAs 144 22.3%
3 OAs 61 9.4%
4 OAs 51 7.9%
5+ OAs 43 6.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 37.5% 2014 2015: 39.3% 2015 2016: 44.2% 2016 2017: 77.2% 2017 2018: 80.0% 2018 2019: 75.8% 2019 2020: 86.4% 2020 2021: 96.1% 2021 2022: 82.0% 2022 2023: 90.2% 2023 2024: 95.7% 2024 2025: 52.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20132150.0%
201424937.5%
2015281139.3%
2016431944.2%
2017574477.2%
2018554480.0%
2019665075.8%
2020595186.4%
2021514996.1%
2022615082.0%
2023615590.2%
2024474595.7%
2025422252.4%
20265000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 643 0.3% 10.3% 77.0% 3.9%
Action 2 299 0.3% 5.7% 87.6% 2.7%
Action 3 155 0.0% 2.6% 93.5% 1.3%
Action 4 94 0.0% 2.1% 95.7% 1.1%
Action 5 43 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 27 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 2 of 235 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,282 office actions
Change +0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
3.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 1, 2021 15/140,083 Reversed §103
Jun. 12, 2017 13/339,554 Affirmed in part N/A
Jan. 26, 2017 13/408,257 Affirmed §103
Oct. 31, 2016 13/600,091 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.