Examiner Jennifer T Nguyen

Grant ratio: 77.5% (82nd percentile in Art Unit 2693 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.80. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.5%
Average office actions / grant 1.80
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78963
Primary art unit
2693
Work group
2690
Technology center
2600
Applications
1,045
Granted applications
810
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7696
Supervisor
Benjamin C Lee
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2963

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 64.8% 2.05
Group 96 51.2% 2.11
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.79 1,875 office actions across 1,045 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 1,039 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.6%
1 OA 538 51.5%
2 OAs 298 28.5%
3 OAs 127 12.2%
4 OAs 46 4.4%
5+ OAs 30 2.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 56.3% 2009 2010: 69.7% 2010 2011: 85.2% 2011 2012: 73.3% 2012 2013: 79.2% 2013 2014: 84.7% 2014 2015: 71.8% 2015 2016: 79.4% 2016 2017: 87.7% 2017 2018: 77.0% 2018 2019: 85.5% 2019 2020: 78.1% 2020 2021: 93.3% 2021 2022: 94.6% 2022 2023: 88.1% 2023 2024: 94.3% 2024 2025: 48.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008241250.0%
2009321856.3%
2010332369.7%
2011615285.2%
2012453373.3%
2013776179.2%
2014857284.7%
2015715171.8%
2016635079.4%
2017575087.7%
2018745777.0%
2019554785.5%
2020645078.1%
2021605693.3%
2022565394.6%
2023595288.1%
2024535094.3%
2025472348.9%
20262900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,039 0.5% 22.0% 69.1% 0.9%
Action 2 501 0.2% 11.0% 81.2% 0.6%
Action 3 203 0.0% 3.9% 92.6% 2.0%
Action 4 76 0.0% 5.3% 88.2% 1.3%
Action 5 30 0.0% 3.3% 86.7% 3.3%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 207 office actions
All years 0.3% 6 of 1,875 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
0.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
2024: AI examples
1.3%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 4, 2022 15/647,947 Affirmed §103
Dec. 16, 2014 11/819,404 Affirmed §103
Oct. 28, 2014 11/647,699 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.