Examiner Dong Hui Liang

Grant ratio: 70.7% (46th percentile in Art Unit 2693 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.03
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92185
Primary art unit
2693
Work group
2690
Technology center
2600
Applications
444
Granted applications
314
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0487
Supervisor
Benjamin C. Lee
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2963

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 64.8% 2.05
Group 96 51.2% 2.11
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.13 947 office actions across 444 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 441 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.7%
1 OA 206 46.4%
2 OAs 109 24.5%
3 OAs 49 11.0%
4 OAs 40 9.0%
5+ OAs 37 8.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 52.6% 2016 2017: 54.3% 2017 2018: 70.4% 2018 2019: 62.0% 2019 2020: 87.2% 2020 2021: 87.5% 2021 2022: 93.2% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014100.0%
201516850.0%
2016382052.6%
2017351954.3%
2018543870.4%
2019503162.0%
2020474187.2%
2021403587.5%
2022444193.2%
20232626100.0%
20243838100.0%
2025341750.0%
20262100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 441 0.9% 9.3% 79.4% 6.8%
Action 2 235 1.3% 6.8% 83.0% 5.5%
Action 3 126 0.8% 2.4% 92.1% 4.8%
Action 4 77 0.0% 3.9% 93.5% 1.3%
Action 5 37 0.0% 0.0% 89.2% 8.1%
Action 6 18 0.0% 5.6% 88.9% 5.6%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.2% 2 of 164 office actions
All years 0.8% 8 of 947 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.9%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
1.5%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.5%
2025: August memo
2.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 11, 2017 13/111,596 Reversed §103
May. 10, 2017 12/061,463 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.