Examiner Emily Frank

Grant ratio: 63.6% (42nd percentile in Art Unit 2695 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.26. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 63.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.26
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86260
Primary art unit
2695
Work group
2690
Technology center
2600
Applications
665
Granted applications
423
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7255
Supervisor
Benjamin C Lee
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2963

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 8 45.1% 1.78
Group 96 51.2% 2.11
Tech Center 1,754 57.4% 1.88
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.23 1,483 office actions across 665 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 662 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.5%
1 OA 249 37.4%
2 OAs 200 30.1%
3 OAs 112 16.8%
4 OAs 53 8.0%
5+ OAs 48 7.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 21.4% 2009 2010: 43.9% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 63.6% 2012 2013: 72.5% 2013 2014: 87.5% 2014 2015: 83.7% 2015 2016: 75.0% 2016 2017: 78.0% 2017 2018: 95.3% 2018 2019: 87.9% 2019 2020: 64.7% 2020 2021: 72.7% 2021 2022: 74.1% 2022 2023: 82.6% 2023 2024: 67.5% 2024 2025: 37.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200942921.4%
2010572543.9%
2011442250.0%
2012553563.6%
2013402972.5%
2014322887.5%
2015494183.7%
2016403075.0%
2017413278.0%
2018434195.3%
2019332987.9%
2020171164.7%
2021221672.7%
2022272074.1%
2023231982.6%
2024402767.5%
202524937.5%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 662 0.3% 23.7% 70.7% 0.6%
Action 2 413 0.7% 13.6% 83.3% 1.5%
Action 3 213 1.4% 17.4% 78.9% 0.9%
Action 4 101 1.0% 11.9% 82.2% 4.0%
Action 5 48 0.0% 14.6% 83.3% 2.1%
Action 6 22 0.0% 18.2% 81.8% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 228 office actions
All years 0.6% 9 of 1,483 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.2%
2.3%
3.9%
1.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 25, 2016 12/405,700 Affirmed §103 · §112
Jan. 27, 2016 12/550,404 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.