AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Walter L. Lindsay, Jr

Appears inactive Last observed office action: July 2025 (11 months ago).

Examiner Walter L. Lindsay, Jr appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 87.9%, they average 1.29 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.29
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
18 years (2008-2025)
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2810 - Semiconductors A / Memory

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
199
Granted Applications
175
Non-Granted Applications
24
Avg OA / Grant
1.29
Last OA Observed
July 2025 (11 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2812 , 2852
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 87.9% 1.29
Art Unit 49 55.5% 1.63
Group 290 58.7% 1.79
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2019 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 36 34 94.4%
2009 54 45 83.3%
2010 58 52 89.7%
2011 46 43 93.5%
No observed data for 2012-2018.
2019 1 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2020-2024.
2025 4 1 25.0%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

175 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 198 0.5% 20.7% 68.7% 5.6%
2 47 2.1% 14.9% 74.5% 2.1%
3 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
4 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
0.0%
2008
1.4%
2009
0.0%
2010
2.0%
2011
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.