Examiner Diana C. Garrity

Grant ratio: 65.5% (45th percentile in Art Unit 2814 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.93. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2024
Grant ratio 65.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.93
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84409
Primary art unit
2814
Work group
2810
Technology center
2800
Applications
281
Granted applications
184

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 36 59.1% 1.77
Group 305 54.6% 1.79
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.96 878 office actions across 297 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 297 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 84 28.3%
2 OAs 73 24.6%
3 OAs 44 14.8%
4 OAs 42 14.1%
5+ OAs 54 18.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 48.4% 2008 2009: 65.0% 2009 2010: 56.7% 2010 2011: 78.6% 2011 2012: 60.0% 2012 2013: 84.6% 2013 2014: 80.0% 2014 2015: 71.4% 2015 2016: 83.3% 2016 2017: 75.0% 2017 2018: 91.7% 2018 2019: 57.1% 2019 2020: 62.5% 2020 2021: 62.5% 2021 2022: 31.3% 2022 2023: 50.0% 2023 2024: 70.0% 2024

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007100.0%
2008311548.4%
2009402665.0%
2010301756.7%
2011282278.6%
201210660.0%
2013131184.6%
2014252080.0%
2015141071.4%
2016121083.3%
20178675.0%
2018121191.7%
20197457.1%
20208562.5%
20218562.5%
202216531.3%
20238450.0%
202410770.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 297 0.0% 16.2% 79.8% 2.0%
Action 2 213 0.0% 14.1% 78.9% 6.1%
Action 3 140 0.0% 8.6% 87.1% 4.3%
Action 4 96 0.0% 9.4% 82.3% 8.3%
Action 5 54 0.0% 11.1% 79.6% 9.3%
Action 6 37 0.0% 13.5% 75.7% 10.8%
Action 7 20 0.0% 15.0% 75.0% 10.0%
Action 8 12 0.0% 16.7% 75.0% 8.3%
Action 9 5 0.0% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 31 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 878 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 4/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 4/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 20, 2023 16/737,237 Reversed N/A
Sep. 19, 2023 16/461,071 Reversed §112
Sep. 25, 2012 11/163,349 Reversed §103
Mar. 19, 2012 10/563,679 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.