Examiner Sitaramarao S Yechuri

Grant ratio: 76.8% (63rd percentile in Art Unit 2818 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.64. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.64
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88242
Primary art unit
2818
Work group
2810
Technology center
2800
Applications
940
Granted applications
722
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8764
Supervisor
Britt D Hanley
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3042

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 48 48.7% 1.60
Group 305 54.6% 1.79
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.77 1,661 office actions across 941 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 941 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 533 56.6%
2 OAs 249 26.5%
3 OAs 71 7.5%
4 OAs 57 6.1%
5+ OAs 31 3.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 54.5% 2012 2013: 36.4% 2013 2014: 53.1% 2014 2015: 62.3% 2015 2016: 81.0% 2016 2017: 88.0% 2017 2018: 94.6% 2018 2019: 98.8% 2019 2020: 93.4% 2020 2021: 95.4% 2021 2022: 94.4% 2022 2023: 98.7% 2023 2024: 93.2% 2024 2025: 44.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012221254.5%
2013331236.4%
2014492653.1%
2015533362.3%
2016635181.0%
2017756688.0%
2018747094.6%
2019807998.8%
2020767193.4%
2021656295.4%
2022716794.4%
2023797898.7%
2024746993.2%
2025592644.1%
20266700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 941 0.2% 1.9% 96.4% 0.4%
Action 2 408 0.2% 2.2% 89.7% 3.9%
Action 3 159 0.0% 1.3% 96.2% 2.5%
Action 4 88 0.0% 1.1% 87.5% 10.2%
Action 5 31 0.0% 9.7% 90.3% 0.0%
Action 6 18 0.0% 5.6% 94.4% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 331 office actions
All years 0.2% 3 of 1,661 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
88.9% 8/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
88.9% 8/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 26, 2020 15/344,735 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Feb. 28, 2019 13/729,806 Reversed §103 · §112
Feb. 21, 2018 14/109,230 Reversed §103
Dec. 15, 2017 13/892,237 Reversed §103
Jan. 18, 2017 13/187,153 Affirmed §103
Dec. 9, 2016 12/635,542 Reversed §103
Jun. 14, 2016 12/853,105 Reversed §103
Feb. 11, 2016 13/100,343 Reversed §103
Sep. 25, 2015 13/605,267 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.