Examiner Michael C. Wimer

Grant ratio: 64.8% (32nd percentile in Art Unit 2821 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.13. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2016
Grant ratio 64.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.13
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
62635
Primary art unit
2821
Work group
2820
Technology center
2800
Applications
469
Granted applications
304

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 67.6% 1.44
Group 208 70.3% 1.64
Tech Center 2,435 61.3% 1.69
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.19 1,025 office actions across 469 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 469 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 208 44.3%
2 OAs 115 24.5%
3 OAs 64 13.6%
4 OAs 50 10.7%
5+ OAs 32 6.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 69.8% 2008 2009: 80.3% 2009 2010: 73.0% 2010 2011: 64.1% 2011 2012: 56.5% 2012 2013: 61.2% 2013 2014: 61.7% 2014 2015: 45.2% 2015 2016: 16.7% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008634469.8%
2009766180.3%
2010634673.0%
2011644164.1%
2012462656.5%
2013674161.2%
2014472961.7%
2015311445.2%
201612216.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 469 0.6% 6.0% 78.7% 5.8%
Action 2 261 0.0% 6.1% 84.7% 3.8%
Action 3 146 0.7% 2.1% 86.3% 4.1%
Action 4 82 1.2% 2.4% 85.4% 2.4%
Action 5 32 0.0% 0.0% 84.4% 9.4%
Action 6 20 0.0% 5.0% 80.0% 15.0%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.5% 5 of 1,025 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
1.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 27, 2017 13/719,745 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 15, 2016 13/047,205 Reversed §103
May. 10, 2016 12/310,752 Reversed N/A
May. 14, 2015 13/048,202 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 27, 2015 12/310,825 Reversed §103
Jul. 25, 2014 11/690,085 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 8, 2014 12/209,609 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 3, 2012 09/915,963 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.