AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Muhammad S Islam

Examiner Muhammad S Islam appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 84.0%, they average 1.53 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.53
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
14 years (2013-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-8439
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2830 - Electrical Circuits and Systems

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
592
Granted Applications
497
Non-Granted Applications
95
Avg OA / Grant
1.53
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2825 , 2827 , 2837 , 2846
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 84.0% 1.53
Art Unit 63 71.7% 1.60
Group 356 68.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2013; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2013 1 1 100.0%
2014 28 16 57.1%
2015 39 34 87.2%
2016 78 63 80.8%
2017 72 65 90.3%
2018 66 59 89.4%
2019 84 74 88.1%
2020 67 57 85.1%
2021 47 46 97.9%
2022 21 20 95.2%
2023 21 21 100.0%
2024 25 24 96.0%
2025 31 17 54.8%
2026 12 0 0.0%

497 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 581 0.9% 34.9% 51.1% 9.0%
2 189 0.5% 23.3% 55.6% 20.1%
3 71 0.0% 21.1% 70.4% 7.0%
4 24 0.0% 16.7% 70.8% 12.5%
5 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
6 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
1.7%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
1.2%
2020
1.8%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
3.6%
2024
0.0%
2025
8.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.