Examiner Pedro J. Cuevas

Grant ratio: 67.1% (22nd percentile in Art Unit 2831 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.64. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.64
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78519
Primary art unit
2831
Work group
2830
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,050
Granted applications
705
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2021
Supervisor
Jessica Han
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2078

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 73.0% 1.46
Group 354 67.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.64 1,727 office actions across 1,050 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 1,050 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 664 63.2%
2 OAs 248 23.6%
3 OAs 68 6.5%
4 OAs 39 3.7%
5+ OAs 31 3.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 67.3% 2008 2009: 73.5% 2009 2010: 66.7% 2010 2011: 73.1% 2011 2012: 67.1% 2012 2013: 54.3% 2013 2014: 73.8% 2014 2015: 72.2% 2015 2016: 75.7% 2016 2017: 58.3% 2017 2018: 71.4% 2018 2019: 76.2% 2019 2020: 75.8% 2020 2021: 74.0% 2021 2022: 83.3% 2022 2023: 78.3% 2023 2024: 75.6% 2024 2025: 32.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008493367.3%
2009493673.5%
2010755066.7%
2011674973.1%
2012855767.1%
2013703854.3%
2014614573.8%
2015543972.2%
2016745675.7%
2017603558.3%
2018493571.4%
2019423276.2%
2020665075.8%
2021503774.0%
2022363083.3%
2023463678.3%
2024413175.6%
2025491632.7%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,050 6.1% 14.9% 69.9% 2.7%
Action 2 386 8.8% 7.5% 77.2% 2.8%
Action 3 138 7.2% 5.8% 82.6% 2.2%
Action 4 70 12.9% 5.7% 80.0% 1.4%
Action 5 31 19.4% 0.0% 83.9% 0.0%
Action 6 17 11.8% 0.0% 88.2% 0.0%
Action 7 11 9.1% 0.0% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 8 9 11.1% 0.0% 77.8% 11.1%
Action 9 6 16.7% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 10 4 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.4% 6 of 175 office actions
All years 7.6% 131 of 1,727 office actions
Change -4.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.6%
2.6%
11.7%
3.7%
11.9%
2014: Alice
14.3%
15.6%
8.8%
12.0%
6.2%
2019: PEG
9.4%
12.4%
4.2%
3.7%
2.9%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
6.1%
6.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 5 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
87.5% 7/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.3 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 14, 2019 12/925,235 Affirmed §102 · §103
Feb. 24, 2017 12/315,616 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 31, 2016 12/462,796 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103
Jul. 15, 2016 12/315,631 Affirmed in part §103
May. 27, 2016 12/462,789 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Oct. 29, 2015 12/455,669 Affirmed in part N/A
Apr. 22, 2014 12/103,159 Reversed N/A
Oct. 25, 2011 11/288,551 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.