Examiner Thomas K Quigley

Grant ratio: 64.6% (18th percentile in Art Unit 2831 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.75. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.75
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89919
Primary art unit
2831
Work group
2830
Technology center
2800
Applications
514
Granted applications
332
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4050
Supervisor
Tulsidas Patel
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2098

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 73.0% 1.46
Group 354 67.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.73 889 office actions across 514 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 514 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 283 55.1%
2 OAs 153 29.8%
3 OAs 46 8.9%
4 OAs 17 3.3%
5+ OAs 15 2.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 42.9% 2014 2015: 62.2% 2015 2016: 81.1% 2016 2017: 78.1% 2017 2018: 58.3% 2018 2019: 78.3% 2019 2020: 83.3% 2020 2021: 84.6% 2021 2022: 90.6% 2022 2023: 85.4% 2023 2024: 68.2% 2024 2025: 38.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013301550.0%
2014281242.9%
2015372362.2%
2016373081.1%
2017322578.1%
2018362158.3%
2019463678.3%
2020302583.3%
2021393384.6%
2022322990.6%
2023413585.4%
2024443068.2%
2025471838.3%
20263500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 514 1.6% 5.3% 72.2% 16.7%
Action 2 231 0.9% 6.9% 72.7% 16.0%
Action 3 78 0.0% 3.8% 84.6% 11.5%
Action 4 32 3.1% 3.1% 87.5% 6.3%
Action 5 15 6.7% 0.0% 93.3% 0.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 9.1%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 208 office actions
All years 1.3% 12 of 889 office actions
Change -0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2019: PEG
3.2%
3.6%
5.7%
3.1%
1.7%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 6, 2024 16/411,262 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 29, 2022 16/873,852 Reversed §103
Oct. 12, 2021 15/555,323 Affirmed in part §103
Jul. 23, 2018 14/509,633 Reversed N/A
Dec. 1, 2017 14/123,257 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 1, 2017 13/849,759 Reversed §103
Apr. 25, 2017 14/085,392 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.