Examiner Jason Collins

Grant ratio: 67.4% (23rd percentile in Art Unit 2833 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.72. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.72
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84693
Primary art unit
2833
Work group
2830
Technology center
2800
Applications
530
Granted applications
357
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3994
Supervisor
Regis Betsch
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7101

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 37 71.2% 1.51
Group 354 67.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.67 883 office actions across 530 applications
Applications with office actions 97.9% 519 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 2.1%
1 OA 316 59.6%
2 OAs 116 21.9%
3 OAs 45 8.5%
4 OAs 27 5.1%
5+ OAs 15 2.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 52.4% 2008 2009: 100.0% 2009 2011: 57.1% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 64.0% 2013 2014: 74.1% 2014 2015: 78.3% 2015 2016: 82.9% 2016 2017: 79.2% 2017 2018: 71.4% 2018 2019: 71.1% 2019 2020: 77.3% 2020 2021: 82.9% 2021 2022: 88.6% 2022 2023: 69.7% 2023 2024: 87.9% 2024 2025: 39.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007100.0%
2008422252.4%
200922100.0%
20117457.1%
2012261350.0%
2013251664.0%
2014272074.1%
2015231878.3%
2016352982.9%
2017241979.2%
2018352571.4%
2019382771.1%
2020443477.3%
2021352982.9%
2022353188.6%
2023332369.7%
2024332987.9%
2025411639.0%
20262400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 519 0.0% 16.4% 62.6% 14.5%
Action 2 203 0.0% 6.4% 85.7% 3.9%
Action 3 87 0.0% 8.0% 83.9% 5.7%
Action 4 42 0.0% 7.1% 90.5% 0.0%
Action 5 15 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 13.3%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 11.1%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 143 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 883 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.4 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 19, 2026 17/889,746 Reversed §102
Sep. 5, 2013 11/741,159 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Apr. 30, 2013 11/424,046 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
May. 27, 2010 11/616,548 Affirmed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.