Examiner Terrance Kenerly

Grant ratio: 69.0% (74th percentile in Art Unit 2834 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.70. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 69.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.70
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86251
Primary art unit
2834
Work group
2830
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,177
Granted applications
812
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7851
Supervisor
Christopher Koehler
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3560

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 56 56.4% 1.54
Group 354 67.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.71 2,008 office actions across 1,177 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 1,174 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.3%
1 OA 691 58.7%
2 OAs 281 23.9%
3 OAs 109 9.3%
4 OAs 56 4.8%
5+ OAs 37 3.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 50.0% 2009 2010: 63.8% 2010 2011: 76.5% 2011 2012: 69.4% 2012 2013: 61.6% 2013 2014: 76.5% 2014 2015: 61.6% 2015 2016: 81.3% 2016 2017: 72.1% 2017 2018: 74.1% 2018 2019: 75.0% 2019 2020: 77.2% 2020 2021: 87.1% 2021 2022: 78.9% 2022 2023: 93.7% 2023 2024: 74.6% 2024 2025: 44.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
2009562850.0%
2010946063.8%
2011685276.5%
2012725069.4%
2013734561.6%
2014685276.5%
2015734561.6%
2016645281.3%
2017614472.1%
2018584374.1%
2019604575.0%
2020796177.2%
2021706187.1%
2022574578.9%
2023635993.7%
2024634774.6%
2025522344.2%
20264500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,174 0.5% 6.2% 89.2% 1.4%
Action 2 483 0.4% 4.6% 92.3% 1.0%
Action 3 202 0.5% 0.5% 98.0% 0.5%
Action 4 93 1.1% 2.2% 94.6% 1.1%
Action 5 37 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 15 0.0% 6.7% 80.0% 6.7%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 243 office actions
All years 0.5% 10 of 2,008 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.5%
1.0%
1.1%
1.8%
2019: PEG
0.9%
0.8%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 5/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 17, 2020 14/912,816 Reversed §103
Jun. 7, 2018 13/614,860 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 19, 2016 13/499,269 Reversed §102
Sep. 22, 2016 13/467,131 Reversed §103
Feb. 3, 2016 12/753,181 Affirmed §103
Mar. 18, 2014 12/130,213 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 30, 2012 11/786,976 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.