Examiner Nidhi Thaker

Grant ratio: 65.7% (38th percentile in Art Unit 2835 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.69. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.69
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84145
Primary art unit
2835
Work group
2830
Technology center
2800
Applications
741
Granted applications
487
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3408
Supervisor
Imani Hayman
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5528

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 46 66.9% 1.64
Group 354 67.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.80 1,333 office actions across 741 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 739 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 418 56.4%
2 OAs 179 24.2%
3 OAs 66 8.9%
4 OAs 47 6.3%
5+ OAs 29 3.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 50.0% 2007 2008: 41.4% 2008 2009: 47.1% 2009 2010: 54.5% 2010 2011: 64.6% 2011 2012: 57.5% 2012 2013: 48.3% 2013 2014: 53.3% 2014 2015: 61.3% 2015 2016: 69.0% 2016 2017: 82.6% 2017 2018: 88.9% 2018 2019: 93.0% 2019 2020: 82.1% 2020 2021: 88.2% 2021 2022: 85.7% 2022 2023: 81.5% 2023 2024: 96.9% 2024 2025: 44.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20072150.0%
2008582441.4%
2009512447.1%
2010442454.5%
2011483164.6%
2012402357.5%
2013582848.3%
2014301653.3%
2015311961.3%
2016422969.0%
2017463882.6%
2018454088.9%
2019434093.0%
2020393282.1%
2021343088.2%
2022282485.7%
2023272281.5%
2024323196.9%
2025251144.0%
20261800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 739 0.0% 18.5% 78.1% 0.5%
Action 2 321 0.0% 10.9% 83.8% 0.6%
Action 3 142 0.0% 5.6% 90.1% 0.7%
Action 4 76 0.0% 5.3% 90.8% 0.0%
Action 5 29 0.0% 10.3% 89.7% 0.0%
Action 6 15 0.0% 13.3% 86.7% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 131 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 1,333 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 23, 2021 16/253,740 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Dec. 16, 2019 15/165,590 Reversed §103
Mar. 18, 2019 14/849,803 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103
Oct. 4, 2017 13/044,928 Affirmed §103
Jan. 27, 2016 12/991,483 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 9, 2014 12/348,597 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 23, 2010 11/199,845 Affirmed in part §100 · §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.