Examiner Xanthia C. Cunningham

Grant ratio: 81.0% (90th percentile in Art Unit 2835 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.53. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 81.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.53
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87542
Primary art unit
2835
Work group
2830
Technology center
2800
Applications
762
Granted applications
617
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1963
Supervisor
Idriss Alrobaye
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1023

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 46 66.9% 1.64
Group 354 67.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.56 1,189 office actions across 762 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 760 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 478 62.7%
2 OAs 190 24.9%
3 OAs 53 7.0%
4 OAs 30 3.9%
5+ OAs 9 1.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 76.0% 2011 2012: 85.2% 2012 2013: 68.9% 2013 2014: 73.7% 2014 2015: 74.2% 2015 2016: 84.6% 2016 2017: 83.6% 2017 2018: 93.0% 2018 2019: 89.1% 2019 2020: 87.0% 2020 2021: 86.8% 2021 2022: 97.1% 2022 2023: 97.7% 2023 2024: 92.3% 2024 2025: 57.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011251976.0%
2012615285.2%
2013614268.9%
2014765673.7%
2015664974.2%
2016655584.6%
2017615183.6%
2018716693.0%
2019645789.1%
2020232087.0%
2021383386.8%
2022353497.1%
2023444397.7%
2024262492.3%
2025281657.1%
20261800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 760 0.3% 17.2% 69.6% 5.5%
Action 2 282 0.4% 16.0% 73.8% 5.0%
Action 3 92 0.0% 5.4% 91.3% 2.2%
Action 4 39 0.0% 2.6% 94.9% 0.0%
Action 5 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 6 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.1% 1 of 94 office actions
All years 0.3% 3 of 1,189 office actions
Change +0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2024: AI examples
3.6%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 16, 2021 15/824,816 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Nov. 7, 2019 14/142,485 Affirmed §103
May. 23, 2018 13/771,781 Affirmed §103
May. 17, 2018 13/418,834 Affirmed §103
Apr. 26, 2017 13/280,916 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.