Examiner Adolf Berhane

Grant ratio: 84.0% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 2838 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.38. Most common rejection type: §102.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 84.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.38
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
69748
Primary art unit
2838
Work group
2830
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,063
Granted applications
893
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2077
Supervisor
Sean P Kayes
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8931

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 60 64.3% 1.59
Group 354 67.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.41 1,504 office actions across 1,063 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 1,061 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 796 74.9%
2 OAs 166 15.6%
3 OAs 53 5.0%
4 OAs 26 2.4%
5+ OAs 20 1.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 81.2% 2008 2009: 79.7% 2009 2010: 74.2% 2010 2011: 85.5% 2011 2012: 82.9% 2012 2013: 93.9% 2013 2014: 84.9% 2014 2015: 87.3% 2015 2016: 91.4% 2016 2017: 92.5% 2017 2018: 91.7% 2018 2019: 95.5% 2019 2020: 93.3% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 90.7% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 95.2% 2024 2025: 41.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008695681.2%
2009645179.7%
2010664974.2%
2011837185.5%
2012766382.9%
2013666293.9%
2014534584.9%
2015635587.3%
2016585391.4%
2017534992.5%
2018605591.7%
2019444295.5%
2020605693.3%
20214848100.0%
2022433990.7%
20234343100.0%
2024424095.2%
2025391641.0%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,061 2.0% 47.9% 30.3% 3.5%
Action 2 265 0.0% 37.7% 43.4% 2.3%
Action 3 99 0.0% 31.3% 50.5% 6.1%
Action 4 46 0.0% 26.1% 58.7% 2.2%
Action 5 20 0.0% 5.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 6 5 0.0% 60.0% 40.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 40.0% 40.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.2% 6 of 144 office actions
All years 1.4% 21 of 1,504 office actions
Change +2.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.9%
0.9%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.2%
2.4%
0.0%
1.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
4.4%
2.2%
2024: AI examples
6.5%
2025: August memo
0.0%
7.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 30, 2018 14/701,532 Affirmed §101
Apr. 24, 2017 13/808,920 Reversed §103
Aug. 22, 2014 12/413,110 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.