Examiner Gary L. Laxton

Grant ratio: 82.3% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 2838 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.61. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 82.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.61
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76897
Primary art unit
2838
Work group
2830
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,127
Granted applications
927
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2079
Supervisor
Sean Kayes
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8931

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 60 64.3% 1.59
Group 354 67.0% 1.58
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.61 1,809 office actions across 1,127 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,122 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.4%
1 OA 698 61.9%
2 OAs 276 24.5%
3 OAs 76 6.7%
4 OAs 49 4.3%
5+ OAs 23 2.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 78.1% 2008 2009: 78.8% 2009 2010: 90.9% 2010 2011: 80.8% 2011 2012: 80.6% 2012 2013: 88.9% 2013 2014: 89.8% 2014 2015: 83.8% 2015 2016: 88.1% 2016 2017: 91.2% 2017 2018: 85.9% 2018 2019: 98.0% 2019 2020: 76.7% 2020 2021: 93.6% 2021 2022: 95.9% 2022 2023: 83.3% 2023 2024: 93.3% 2024 2025: 60.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008645078.1%
2009856778.8%
2010666090.9%
2011735980.8%
2012725880.6%
2013998888.9%
2014494489.8%
2015746283.8%
2016595288.1%
2017575291.2%
2018645585.9%
2019504998.0%
2020433376.7%
2021474493.6%
2022494795.9%
2023423583.3%
2024454293.3%
2025503060.0%
20263900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,122 1.3% 13.5% 44.0% 13.1%
Action 2 424 0.0% 12.5% 56.6% 8.5%
Action 3 148 0.0% 10.1% 64.9% 6.1%
Action 4 72 0.0% 11.1% 61.1% 5.6%
Action 5 23 0.0% 4.3% 56.5% 26.1%
Action 6 14 0.0% 14.3% 57.1% 7.1%
Action 7 2 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 205 office actions
All years 0.8% 15 of 1,809 office actions
Change -0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.7%
0.9%
1.4%
0.7%
1.4%
2014: Alice
2.6%
0.0%
0.9%
1.1%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.1%
1.6%
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 4, 2021 14/863,014 Affirmed §112 · §120
Mar. 29, 2017 13/421,001 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Mar. 11, 2011 10/846,451 Affirmed §103
Sep. 29, 2010 11/337,925 Affirmed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.