Examiner Thomas J. Hiltunen

Grant ratio: 75.8% (25th percentile in Art Unit 2842 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.68. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: September 2026
Grant ratio 75.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.68
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81182
Primary art unit
2842
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,295
Granted applications
982
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5525
Supervisor
Menatoallah Youssef
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3684

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 40 77.8% 1.54
Group 232 67.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,428 61.6% 1.69
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.71 2,218 office actions across 1,295 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 1,293 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.2%
1 OA 710 54.8%
2 OAs 391 30.2%
3 OAs 92 7.1%
4 OAs 69 5.3%
5+ OAs 31 2.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 74.5% 2008 2009: 66.1% 2009 2010: 75.8% 2010 2011: 66.1% 2011 2012: 69.4% 2012 2013: 77.3% 2013 2014: 81.3% 2014 2015: 76.9% 2015 2016: 85.5% 2016 2017: 84.8% 2017 2018: 85.9% 2018 2019: 89.5% 2019 2020: 86.1% 2020 2021: 93.7% 2021 2022: 91.4% 2022 2023: 93.9% 2023 2024: 76.6% 2024 2025: 55.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008554174.5%
2009593966.1%
2010665075.8%
2011624166.1%
2012855969.4%
2013886877.3%
2014756181.3%
2015655076.9%
2016695985.5%
2017665684.8%
2018786785.9%
2019575189.5%
2020796886.1%
2021635993.7%
2022706491.4%
2023666293.9%
2024644976.6%
2025683855.9%
20266000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,293 0.1% 21.9% 68.8% 5.9%
Action 2 583 0.2% 15.8% 76.5% 5.7%
Action 3 192 0.0% 10.9% 81.8% 5.2%
Action 4 100 0.0% 14.0% 76.0% 8.0%
Action 5 31 0.0% 6.5% 80.6% 12.9%
Action 6 11 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 9.1%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 315 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 2,218 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 5, 2024 17/249,691 Affirmed §103
Oct. 2, 2019 15/056,994 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 28, 2017 14/293,785 Affirmed §103
Jun. 15, 2017 13/905,260 Affirmed §102 · §103
Nov. 16, 2015 13/013,986 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 21, 2014 12/282,240 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 31, 2012 11/618,655 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.