Examiner Patrick O'Neill

Grant ratio: 78.2% (28th percentile in Art Unit 2842 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.48. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.48
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83209
Primary art unit
2842
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
586
Granted applications
458
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1677
Supervisor
Lincoln Donovan
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1988

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 40 78.2% 1.54
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.52 889 office actions across 586 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 586 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 390 66.6%
2 OAs 127 21.7%
3 OAs 45 7.7%
4 OAs 17 2.9%
5+ OAs 7 1.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 64.3% 2008 2009: 77.2% 2009 2010: 82.9% 2010 2011: 86.5% 2011 2012: 70.0% 2012 2013: 80.5% 2013 2014: 82.8% 2014 2015: 80.8% 2015 2016: 77.8% 2016 2017: 79.3% 2017 2018: 89.5% 2018 2019: 96.2% 2019 2020: 89.3% 2020 2021: 94.7% 2021 2022: 92.3% 2022 2023: 94.1% 2023 2024: 93.1% 2024 2025: 51.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008422764.3%
2009574477.2%
2010352982.9%
2011373286.5%
2012402870.0%
2013413380.5%
2014292482.8%
2015262180.8%
2016181477.8%
2017292379.3%
2018191789.5%
2019262596.2%
2020282589.3%
2021191894.7%
2022262492.3%
2023343294.1%
2024292793.1%
2025291551.7%
20262200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 586 0.7% 30.5% 35.7% 17.1%
Action 2 196 0.0% 38.8% 44.9% 12.2%
Action 3 69 0.0% 14.5% 56.5% 20.3%
Action 4 24 0.0% 8.3% 79.2% 12.5%
Action 5 7 0.0% 14.3% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 6 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 1 of 113 office actions
All years 0.4% 4 of 889 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
3.1%
0.0%
2.8%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.7%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 15, 2020 14/456,805 Reversed §103
Dec. 23, 2016 13/456,574 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Apr. 29, 2015 12/433,270 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
May. 30, 2014 12/494,681 Reversed §103
Jul. 12, 2012 11/541,475 Affirmed §112
Jun. 27, 2012 11/593,376 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 25, 2012 11/380,901 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.