Examiner Daniel Rojas

Grant ratio: 83.7% (57th percentile in Art Unit 2842 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.56. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 83.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.56
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84340
Primary art unit
2842
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
959
Granted applications
803
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5070
Supervisor
Menatoallah Yousseff
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3684

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 40 78.2% 1.54
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.60 1,536 office actions across 963 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 963 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 586 60.9%
2 OAs 254 26.4%
3 OAs 76 7.9%
4 OAs 33 3.4%
5+ OAs 14 1.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 50.0% 2007 2008: 72.5% 2008 2009: 82.7% 2009 2010: 80.0% 2010 2011: 90.0% 2011 2012: 91.7% 2012 2013: 84.2% 2013 2014: 92.5% 2014 2015: 93.5% 2015 2016: 94.3% 2016 2017: 92.5% 2017 2018: 95.7% 2018 2019: 92.7% 2019 2020: 89.2% 2020 2021: 85.4% 2021 2022: 93.3% 2022 2023: 92.5% 2023 2024: 76.5% 2024 2025: 51.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20072150.0%
2008402972.5%
2009524382.7%
2010554480.0%
2011706390.0%
2012484491.7%
2013574884.2%
2014534992.5%
2015464393.5%
2016706694.3%
2017676292.5%
2018706795.7%
2019555192.7%
2020373389.2%
2021484185.4%
2022454293.3%
2023403792.5%
2024171376.5%
2025522751.9%
20263500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 963 0.2% 24.3% 59.7% 11.6%
Action 2 377 0.0% 19.1% 70.0% 6.6%
Action 3 123 0.0% 13.8% 78.0% 6.5%
Action 4 47 0.0% 14.9% 72.3% 6.4%
Action 5 14 0.0% 7.1% 71.4% 21.4%
Action 6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 174 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 1,536 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 21, 2026 18/354,034 Reversed §102 · §112
Aug. 22, 2025 17/532,323 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 6, 2021 15/873,758 Affirmed §103
May. 24, 2016 12/748,345 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 24, 2015 12/698,479 Affirmed in part N/A
Feb. 25, 2014 12/050,876 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.