Examiner Tung X. Le

Grant ratio: 83.3% (71st percentile in Art Unit 2844 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.51. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 83.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.51
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81671
Primary art unit
2844
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,696
Granted applications
1,413
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6010
Supervisor
Regis Betsch
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-7101

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 71.5% 1.65
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.49 2,534 office actions across 1,696 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 1,691 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 0.3%
1 OA 1,111 65.5%
2 OAs 410 24.2%
3 OAs 110 6.5%
4 OAs 38 2.2%
5+ OAs 22 1.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 74.0% 2008 2009: 83.5% 2009 2010: 74.0% 2010 2011: 86.1% 2011 2012: 84.2% 2012 2013: 85.2% 2013 2014: 85.1% 2014 2015: 87.5% 2015 2016: 92.3% 2016 2017: 91.7% 2017 2018: 92.7% 2018 2019: 94.4% 2019 2020: 88.3% 2020 2021: 90.6% 2021 2022: 91.3% 2022 2023: 83.3% 2023 2024: 94.1% 2024 2025: 51.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008735474.0%
2009796683.5%
2010967174.0%
20111018786.1%
201212010184.2%
20131089285.2%
20141149785.1%
2015887787.5%
20161049692.3%
201710910091.7%
2018968992.7%
2019898494.4%
2020948388.3%
2021857790.6%
2022807391.3%
2023847083.3%
2024686494.1%
2025623251.6%
20264600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,691 0.1% 34.8% 46.9% 5.0%
Action 2 580 0.2% 17.8% 53.1% 15.5%
Action 3 170 0.0% 14.1% 67.1% 11.8%
Action 4 60 0.0% 11.7% 75.0% 8.3%
Action 5 22 0.0% 9.1% 72.7% 18.2%
Action 6 7 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 244 office actions
All years 0.1% 3 of 2,534 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 29, 2025 17/187,339 Affirmed §103
Jun. 4, 2014 11/934,901 Reversed §103
Nov. 25, 2013 11/765,081 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.