Examiner Monica C King

Grant ratio: 78.1% (51st percentile in Art Unit 2844 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.82. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.82
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88945
Primary art unit
2844
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
502
Granted applications
392
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3429
Supervisor
Alexander H. Taningco
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8048

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 38 71.5% 1.65
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.81 910 office actions across 502 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 502 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 266 53.0%
2 OAs 135 26.9%
3 OAs 54 10.8%
4 OAs 29 5.8%
5+ OAs 18 3.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 63.0% 2013 2014: 74.4% 2014 2015: 82.1% 2015 2016: 79.5% 2016 2017: 97.4% 2017 2018: 77.3% 2018 2019: 87.9% 2019 2020: 97.5% 2020 2021: 92.7% 2021 2022: 90.3% 2022 2023: 80.0% 2023 2024: 87.9% 2024 2025: 40.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012200.0%
2013271763.0%
2014433274.4%
2015282382.1%
2016443579.5%
2017383797.4%
2018221777.3%
2019585187.9%
2020403997.5%
2021413892.7%
2022312890.3%
2023403280.0%
2024332987.9%
2025351440.0%
20262000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 502 0.8% 45.6% 45.8% 2.2%
Action 2 236 0.8% 36.4% 56.4% 2.5%
Action 3 101 1.0% 18.8% 75.2% 4.0%
Action 4 47 0.0% 17.0% 76.6% 4.3%
Action 5 18 0.0% 11.1% 83.3% 5.6%
Action 6 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 1 of 139 office actions
All years 0.8% 7 of 910 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.8%
2.6%
0.0%
2.3%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
2.3%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 5/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 30, 2018 13/656,559 Reversed §103
Sep. 16, 2016 13/023,907 Reversed §103
Sep. 6, 2016 13/027,041 Reversed §101 · §103
May. 27, 2016 13/376,755 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
May. 18, 2016 13/060,369 Affirmed in part §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.