Examiner Graham Smith

Grant ratio: 69.6% (40th percentile in Art Unit 2845 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.74. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 69.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.74
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87111
Primary art unit
2845
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
687
Granted applications
478
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1568
Supervisor
Dameon Levi
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2105

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 50 67.0% 1.67
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.80 1,236 office actions across 687 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 680 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.0%
1 OA 375 54.6%
2 OAs 173 25.2%
3 OAs 63 9.2%
4 OAs 40 5.8%
5+ OAs 29 4.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 14.7% 2011 2012: 33.3% 2012 2013: 60.5% 2013 2014: 65.2% 2014 2015: 61.9% 2015 2016: 73.4% 2016 2017: 83.3% 2017 2018: 90.2% 2018 2019: 97.8% 2019 2020: 89.7% 2020 2021: 96.1% 2021 2022: 96.9% 2022 2023: 95.1% 2023 2024: 90.0% 2024 2025: 54.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010600.0%
201134514.7%
2012541833.3%
2013382360.5%
2014463065.2%
2015422661.9%
2016644773.4%
2017302583.3%
2018514690.2%
2019464597.8%
2020393589.7%
2021514996.1%
2022323196.9%
2023413995.1%
2024403690.0%
2025422354.8%
20263100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 680 0.4% 4.3% 82.1% 8.5%
Action 2 305 0.3% 3.6% 78.0% 15.7%
Action 3 132 0.0% 3.0% 84.1% 11.4%
Action 4 69 0.0% 4.3% 81.2% 14.5%
Action 5 29 0.0% 10.3% 79.3% 10.3%
Action 6 17 0.0% 5.9% 70.6% 23.5%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 174 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,236 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
3.5%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
20.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 29, 2018 12/936,267 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 21, 2017 13/643,647 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 27, 2016 12/431,985 Affirmed §103
Feb. 10, 2016 12/609,082 Affirmed §102
Oct. 29, 2015 12/499,169 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 18, 2015 12/347,238 Affirmed N/A
May. 16, 2013 12/431,196 Dismissed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.