Examiner Hung V. Ngo

Grant ratio: 77.3% (62nd percentile in Art Unit 2847 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.66
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
73736
Primary art unit
2847
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
972
Granted applications
751
Examiner phone
(571) 272-1979
Supervisor
Imani Hayman
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5528

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 62.9% 1.65
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.65 1,608 office actions across 972 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 972 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 571 58.7%
2 OAs 269 27.7%
3 OAs 68 7.0%
4 OAs 43 4.4%
5+ OAs 21 2.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 61.7% 2008 2009: 73.4% 2009 2010: 70.0% 2010 2011: 84.3% 2011 2012: 73.7% 2012 2013: 77.2% 2013 2014: 85.4% 2014 2015: 75.4% 2015 2016: 77.1% 2016 2017: 92.5% 2017 2018: 93.0% 2018 2019: 89.6% 2019 2020: 86.6% 2020 2021: 80.4% 2021 2022: 85.2% 2022 2023: 89.4% 2023 2024: 92.1% 2024 2025: 48.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008603761.7%
2009644773.4%
2010604270.0%
2011514384.3%
2012574273.7%
2013574477.2%
2014484185.4%
2015574375.4%
2016483777.1%
2017403792.5%
2018575393.0%
2019484389.6%
2020675886.6%
2021514180.4%
2022544685.2%
2023474289.4%
2024383592.1%
2025412048.8%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 972 0.5% 19.8% 74.3% 1.0%
Action 2 401 0.2% 9.5% 87.0% 0.7%
Action 3 132 0.0% 6.8% 90.9% 1.5%
Action 4 64 0.0% 12.5% 84.4% 0.0%
Action 5 21 0.0% 4.8% 90.5% 0.0%
Action 6 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 152 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,608 office actions
Change -0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.8%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
1.5%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 31, 2017 14/011,237 Affirmed §103
Feb. 23, 2017 13/408,058 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 17, 2014 12/464,432 Affirmed N/A
May. 27, 2014 12/149,924 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
May. 15, 2014 11/918,922 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 31, 2014 11/465,744 Reversed N/A
Nov. 19, 2013 11/770,736 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 25, 2012 11/326,558 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.