Examiner Hoa C. Nguyen

Grant ratio: 79.4% (70th percentile in Art Unit 2847 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.47. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2025
Grant ratio 79.4%
Average office actions / grant 1.47
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81128
Primary art unit
2847
Work group
2840
Technology center
2800
Applications
906
Granted applications
719

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 62.9% 1.65
Group 231 68.9% 1.60
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.48 1,347 office actions across 908 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 908 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 609 67.1%
2 OAs 201 22.1%
3 OAs 68 7.5%
4 OAs 24 2.6%
5+ OAs 6 0.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 61.0% 2008 2009: 60.3% 2009 2010: 76.2% 2010 2011: 74.1% 2011 2012: 75.8% 2012 2013: 67.3% 2013 2014: 68.1% 2014 2015: 73.9% 2015 2016: 76.5% 2016 2017: 84.2% 2017 2018: 90.9% 2018 2019: 84.6% 2019 2020: 92.9% 2020 2021: 91.7% 2021 2022: 94.5% 2022 2023: 87.8% 2023 2024: 91.9% 2024 2025: 83.3% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008412561.0%
2009583560.3%
2010634876.2%
2011584374.1%
2012624775.8%
2013493367.3%
2014694768.1%
2015463473.9%
2016513976.5%
2017574884.2%
2018444090.9%
2019393384.6%
2020706592.9%
2021605591.7%
2022555294.5%
2023413687.8%
2024373491.9%
20256583.3%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 908 0.2% 13.4% 79.6% 1.1%
Action 2 299 0.0% 11.0% 84.3% 0.7%
Action 3 98 0.0% 8.2% 85.7% 2.0%
Action 4 30 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 5 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 65 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 1,347 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 30, 2016 13/478,465 Affirmed §103
Jan. 7, 2014 11/337,792 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Dec. 12, 2013 11/761,195 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 30, 2013 11/564,675 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.