Examiner Rodney Fuller

Grant ratio: 78.8% (34th percentile in Art Unit 2852 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.31. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.31
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
76857
Primary art unit
2852
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,337
Granted applications
1,054
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2118
Supervisor
Stephanie Bloss
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3555

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 59 80.7% 1.48
Group 380 61.0% 1.65
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.36 1,812 office actions across 1,337 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,331 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.4%
1 OA 1,016 76.0%
2 OAs 215 16.1%
3 OAs 61 4.6%
4 OAs 21 1.6%
5+ OAs 18 1.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 100.0% 2007 2008: 57.4% 2008 2009: 71.0% 2009 2010: 88.4% 2010 2011: 92.1% 2011 2012: 79.5% 2012 2013: 82.9% 2013 2014: 80.3% 2014 2015: 83.1% 2015 2016: 81.2% 2016 2017: 81.6% 2017 2018: 85.7% 2018 2019: 87.9% 2019 2020: 89.9% 2020 2021: 91.3% 2021 2022: 92.4% 2022 2023: 81.8% 2023 2024: 90.4% 2024 2025: 48.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200711100.0%
2008543157.4%
2009936671.0%
2010867688.4%
2011898292.1%
2012836679.5%
2013705882.9%
2014665380.3%
2015594983.1%
2016695681.2%
2017766281.6%
2018635485.7%
2019665887.9%
2020696289.9%
2021464291.3%
2022666192.4%
2023776381.8%
2024837590.4%
2025803948.8%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,331 3.7% 39.4% 41.6% 1.9%
Action 2 315 3.8% 22.9% 54.6% 1.3%
Action 3 100 5.0% 21.0% 70.0% 0.0%
Action 4 39 2.6% 15.4% 79.5% 0.0%
Action 5 18 5.6% 5.6% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.8% 2 of 266 office actions
All years 3.8% 68 of 1,812 office actions
Change -3.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.9%
1.6%
0.0%
4.7%
0.8%
5.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
3.7%
17.6%
12.6%
5.8%
2019: PEG
1.2%
1.2%
2.0%
3.8%
5.6%
2024: AI examples
1.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 2, 2019 14/173,497 Affirmed §103
Sep. 17, 2018 14/178,355 Affirmed §101
Mar. 7, 2018 13/663,790 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Jan. 20, 2016 10/872,265 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 24, 2015 12/755,767 Reversed §103
Apr. 23, 2014 12/347,022 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 17, 2013 10/544,406 Affirmed §102 · §112
Apr. 18, 2012 11/196,139 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.