Examiner Henok Legesse

Grant ratio: 82.1% (68th percentile in Art Unit 2853 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.47. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 82.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.47
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83061
Primary art unit
2853
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,094
Granted applications
898
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1615
Supervisor
Douglas Rodriguez
Supervisor phone
(571) 431-0716

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 52 63.5% 1.63
Group 380 61.0% 1.65
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.50 1,637 office actions across 1,094 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,090 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.4%
1 OA 767 70.1%
2 OAs 179 16.4%
3 OAs 91 8.3%
4 OAs 35 3.2%
5+ OAs 18 1.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 77.5% 2008 2009: 83.9% 2009 2010: 63.5% 2010 2011: 73.5% 2011 2012: 83.1% 2012 2013: 88.0% 2013 2014: 86.4% 2014 2015: 85.3% 2015 2016: 88.1% 2016 2017: 93.7% 2017 2018: 89.3% 2018 2019: 96.5% 2019 2020: 96.3% 2020 2021: 97.7% 2021 2022: 81.4% 2022 2023: 90.7% 2023 2024: 86.0% 2024 2025: 62.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008403177.5%
2009625283.9%
2010634063.5%
2011685073.5%
2012594983.1%
2013837388.0%
2014595186.4%
2015756485.3%
2016595288.1%
2017635993.7%
2018756789.3%
2019575596.5%
2020545296.3%
2021444397.7%
2022433581.4%
2023544990.7%
2024504386.0%
2025533362.3%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,090 0.8% 23.0% 59.3% 5.5%
Action 2 323 0.9% 14.9% 73.4% 4.3%
Action 3 144 0.0% 11.1% 83.3% 1.4%
Action 4 53 0.0% 7.5% 81.1% 1.9%
Action 5 18 0.0% 22.2% 72.2% 5.6%
Action 6 7 0.0% 14.3% 71.4% 14.3%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.1% 2 of 175 office actions
All years 0.7% 12 of 1,637 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.8%
0.8%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.7%
4.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2024: AI examples
3.3%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 25, 2022 16/034,468 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 21, 2017 11/505,258 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Mar. 20, 2015 11/990,132 Reversed N/A
Dec. 18, 2012 11/028,897 Reversed §103
May. 8, 2012 11/264,830 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.