Examiner Paul West

Grant ratio: 79.0% (75th percentile in Art Unit 2856 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.51. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 79.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.51
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80924
Primary art unit
2856
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
1,033
Granted applications
816
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2139
Supervisor
Kristina Deherrera
Supervisor phone
(303) 297-4237

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 42 70.4% 1.54
Group 384 59.8% 1.65
Tech Center 2,435 61.3% 1.69
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.48 1,534 office actions across 1,033 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 1,029 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.4%
1 OA 673 65.2%
2 OAs 262 25.4%
3 OAs 60 5.8%
4 OAs 20 1.9%
5+ OAs 14 1.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 100.0% 2009 2010: 57.1% 2010 2011: 75.9% 2011 2012: 73.8% 2012 2013: 77.0% 2013 2014: 82.8% 2014 2015: 82.5% 2015 2016: 86.3% 2016 2017: 81.5% 2017 2018: 93.2% 2018 2019: 83.1% 2019 2020: 90.1% 2020 2021: 84.4% 2021 2022: 88.2% 2022 2023: 90.6% 2023 2024: 88.7% 2024 2025: 45.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200911100.0%
20107457.1%
2011584475.9%
2012654873.8%
2013614777.0%
2014645382.8%
2015806682.5%
2016806986.3%
2017816681.5%
2018736893.2%
2019715983.1%
2020716490.1%
2021645484.4%
2022514588.2%
2023534890.6%
2024625588.7%
2025552545.5%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,029 0.9% 7.3% 66.2% 18.7%
Action 2 356 0.3% 12.6% 74.7% 8.7%
Action 3 94 2.1% 5.3% 80.9% 9.6%
Action 4 34 0.0% 11.8% 76.5% 8.8%
Action 5 14 0.0% 7.1% 64.3% 21.4%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.0% 2 of 197 office actions
All years 0.8% 12 of 1,534 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
2024: AI examples
1.4%
2025: August memo
1.6%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 9, 2016 13/028,072 Affirmed §103
Mar. 22, 2016 12/882,913 Reversed N/A
Feb. 29, 2016 12/876,501 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 24, 2014 12/479,246 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.