Examiner Xin Y Zhong

Grant ratio: 66.2% (22nd percentile in Art Unit 2856 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.77. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: September 2026
Grant ratio 66.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.77
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90562
Primary art unit
2856
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
669
Granted applications
443
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3798
Supervisor
Kristina Deherrera
Supervisor phone
(303) 297-4237

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 42 70.4% 1.54
Group 384 59.8% 1.65
Tech Center 2,435 61.3% 1.69
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.81 1,211 office actions across 669 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 668 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 375 56.1%
2 OAs 160 23.9%
3 OAs 68 10.2%
4 OAs 38 5.7%
5+ OAs 27 4.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 100.0% 2013 2014: 63.3% 2014 2015: 53.8% 2015 2016: 71.7% 2016 2017: 73.6% 2017 2018: 82.9% 2018 2019: 77.4% 2019 2020: 82.8% 2020 2021: 72.7% 2021 2022: 86.7% 2022 2023: 78.0% 2023 2024: 75.9% 2024 2025: 43.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201333100.0%
2014493163.3%
2015392153.8%
2016533871.7%
2017533973.6%
2018413482.9%
2019534177.4%
2020584882.8%
2021554072.7%
2022453986.7%
2023503978.0%
2024584475.9%
2025602643.3%
20265200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 668 0.7% 3.6% 81.7% 10.8%
Action 2 293 0.0% 2.7% 90.8% 5.5%
Action 3 133 0.8% 1.5% 90.2% 6.8%
Action 4 65 0.0% 3.1% 89.2% 7.7%
Action 5 27 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 3.7%
Action 6 15 0.0% 0.0% 86.7% 13.3%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 14.3%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.6% 4 of 255 office actions
All years 0.5% 6 of 1,211 office actions
Change +1.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
8.3%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
1.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.2%
3.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
13.6 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 26, 2025 17/362,756 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 5, 2022 16/575,533 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Jun. 24, 2021 15/095,562 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 28, 2020 14/864,849 Affirmed §103
Nov. 4, 2019 14/373,701 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Jan. 7, 2019 13/523,101 Affirmed in part §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.