AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Leonard S. Liang

Examiner Leonard S. Liang appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 56.9%, they average 2.40 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.40
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2148
Predicted Supervisor
Arleen M Vazquez
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-2619
Tech Center
2800 - Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components
Group
2850 - Printing / Measuring and Testing

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
680
Granted Applications
387
Non-Granted Applications
293
Avg OA / Grant
2.40
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2853 , 2857 , 2862
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 56.9% 2.40
Art Unit 52 64.4% 1.63
Group 372 63.2% 1.66
Tech Center 2,370 64.7% 1.69
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 35 25 71.4%
2009 67 55 82.1%
2010 43 33 76.7%
2011 51 41 80.4%
2012 48 39 81.3%
2013 43 29 67.4%
2014 45 28 62.2%
2015 24 17 70.8%
2016 21 7 33.3%
2017 34 14 41.2%
2018 24 14 58.3%
2019 28 7 25.0%
2020 48 29 60.4%
2021 40 32 80.0%
2022 9 3 33.3%
2023 17 3 17.6%
2024 34 8 23.5%
2025 50 3 6.0%
2026 19 0 0.0%

387 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 669 3.4% 14.1% 76.1% 3.6%
2 455 7.7% 9.0% 73.4% 8.1%
3 260 10.4% 5.4% 73.8% 9.2%
4 170 12.4% 1.8% 73.5% 11.8%
5 91 6.6% 0.0% 75.8% 16.5%
6 52 1.9% 1.9% 71.2% 21.2%
7 24 12.5% 0.0% 75.0% 8.3%
8 14 28.6% 0.0% 64.3% 0.0%
9 5 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
1.6%
2008
0.0%
2009
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
3.2%
2015
7.1%
2016
19.7%
2017
40.7%
2018
9.5%
2019
6.2%
2020
11.8%
2021
1.3%
2022
1.0%
2023
4.7%
2024
6.3%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.