Examiner Zixuan Zhou

Grant ratio: 67.7% (73rd percentile in Art Unit 2859 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.75. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 67.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.75
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90537
Primary art unit
2859
Work group
2850
Technology center
2800
Applications
651
Granted applications
441
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6739
Supervisor
Julian Huffman
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2147

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 56 45.9% 1.72
Group 380 61.0% 1.65
Tech Center 2,413 62.4% 1.69
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.72 1,119 office actions across 651 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 648 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.5%
1 OA 358 55.0%
2 OAs 175 26.9%
3 OAs 75 11.5%
4 OAs 23 3.5%
5+ OAs 17 2.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 41.2% 2014 2015: 48.8% 2015 2016: 57.4% 2016 2017: 70.4% 2017 2018: 93.0% 2018 2019: 80.6% 2019 2020: 84.7% 2020 2021: 85.4% 2021 2022: 88.9% 2022 2023: 87.0% 2023 2024: 82.7% 2024 2025: 51.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20132150.0%
2014341441.2%
2015432148.8%
2016543157.4%
2017543870.4%
2018575393.0%
2019625080.6%
2020595084.7%
2021484185.4%
2022363288.9%
2023464087.0%
2024524382.7%
2025522751.9%
20265200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 648 0.9% 10.0% 82.1% 3.4%
Action 2 290 0.7% 17.6% 76.9% 1.7%
Action 3 115 0.0% 7.0% 84.3% 5.2%
Action 4 40 0.0% 0.0% 97.5% 2.5%
Action 5 17 0.0% 11.8% 82.4% 5.9%
Action 6 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.3% 3 of 229 office actions
All years 0.7% 8 of 1,119 office actions
Change +0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
3.3%
2024: AI examples
1.4%
2025: August memo
0.0%
3.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.3 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 24, 2018 14/309,560 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Oct. 30, 2017 13/406,241 Reversed §103
Nov. 14, 2016 12/427,892 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.