Examiner David Chung

Grant ratio: 58.6% (30th percentile in Art Unit 2871 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.39. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 58.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.39
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78593
Primary art unit
2871
Work group
2870
Technology center
2800
Applications
759
Granted applications
445
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2288
Supervisor
Michael Caley
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-2286

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 44 58.4% 1.93
Group 352 60.5% 1.71
Tech Center 2,435 61.3% 1.69
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.40 1,821 office actions across 759 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 756 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.4%
1 OA 278 36.6%
2 OAs 224 29.5%
3 OAs 102 13.4%
4 OAs 64 8.4%
5+ OAs 88 11.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 84.4% 2008 2009: 84.2% 2009 2010: 81.8% 2010 2011: 66.7% 2011 2012: 75.7% 2012 2013: 79.4% 2013 2014: 55.9% 2014 2015: 48.8% 2015 2016: 45.5% 2016 2017: 43.9% 2017 2018: 58.1% 2018 2019: 51.2% 2019 2020: 65.9% 2020 2021: 75.7% 2021 2022: 86.2% 2022 2023: 88.2% 2023 2024: 81.1% 2024 2025: 20.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008453884.4%
2009191684.2%
2010332781.8%
2011332266.7%
2012372875.7%
2013342779.4%
2014341955.9%
2015432148.8%
2016331545.5%
2017411843.9%
2018432558.1%
2019412151.2%
2020442965.9%
2021372875.7%
2022292586.2%
2023343088.2%
2024534381.1%
2025631320.6%
20266300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 756 0.3% 11.9% 80.7% 1.2%
Action 2 478 0.0% 9.6% 86.6% 1.9%
Action 3 254 0.0% 7.9% 87.4% 3.1%
Action 4 152 0.0% 10.5% 85.5% 3.3%
Action 5 88 0.0% 6.8% 89.8% 1.1%
Action 6 44 0.0% 4.5% 93.2% 2.3%
Action 7 21 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 311 office actions
All years 0.1% 2 of 1,821 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 29, 2017 13/560,484 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.